In “The Nature Of Prejudice”,
Allport is better suited for this type of topic, since he seems to talk more about stereotyping and feelings that are provoked by prejudice and racism.
In the first chapter, he discusses what the “problem” is, which is prejudice. In this portion will refer back to it occasionally to present other issues or things I may have missed.
In this excerpt from Chapter 1, he gives the definition but although it’s only for negative prejudice, it is well suited for what we are trying to accomplish. But as we proceed, I will apply other definitions of prejudice that has been presented.
“Perhaps the briefest of all definitions of prejudice is: thinking ill of others without sufficient warrant. This crisp phrasing contains the two essential ingredients of all definitions- reference to unfounded judgment and to a feeling-tone. It is, however, too brief for complete clarity.
In the first place, it refers only to negative prejudice. People may be prejudiced in favor of others; they may think well of them without sufficient warrant.” (Allport, 6)
In a sense, we can tie what he says here, to the application of the jokes presented. Whenever someone tells a not-so-tasteful joke, we can imply that they thought ill of the group or person that was the subject of the joke. And usually, making a joke on that level can have some sort of judgement and the joke, if delivered properly, can definitely provoke emotion. Good or bad.
And when emotion is involved according to our lectures, things tend to become irrational, and that’s when it starts to get muddy…